Tue Jan 04 03:35:41 +0000 2022
[tweet] [link]
Like Josh says, this did not, in fact, age well at all. Based off the information he received from "Weaponized Autism" - who I'm 99.9% confident is Conan Hayes - Byrne thought Lindell was going to foil the deep state by presenting us with the mythical PCAPs we'd been promised
Tweet of JoshMerrJ3ckyl/1478186883465322500
[tweet] [link]
Of course that's not what happened at all, and the Symposium was a disorganized mess. Still, there's some interesting information in this article.
[tweet] [link]
Quick break down:
First, why do I think Weaponized Autism = Conan?
In The Deep Rig book, Byrne is dining with WA, "75", and others on Thanksgiving 2020 when they get word about Antrim, MI. The book jumps to the Antrim, visit, where we know Conan was on 11/27
[tweet] [link]
That's the first and only mention of WA and "75" by name (or at least pseudonym) in the book. But Byrne's pre-Symposium blog post has some additional details. The description matches: Conan came up from a pro-surfing background, and seemed to be mostly self taught.
[tweet] [link]
Based off information I've received from other sources - including this article re: Antrim - I believe "75" is likely Todd B. Sanders.
[tweet] [link]
With all this in mind, we can deobfuscate Byrne's article into something that actually makes sense: a (rough) timeline of how Dennis Montgomery's bunk PCAP data made it from Montgomery to the Symposium.
[tweet] [link]
Er, looks like the quoted tweets unavailable at the moment, so here's the article it links: https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/08/i-predict-in-mike-lindells-south-dakota-reveal-this-week-data-will-not-be-shown-fake/
[tweet] [link]
First, let's establish some provenance for the PCAPs. In The Deep Rig P72, Byrne discusses "packet traffic" that was provided to him by a super secret source he can't name. He even provides a spreadsheet with data: https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/US-Election-Fraud-2020_General.xlsx
[tweet] [link]
I also have to quickly point how incredibly dumb that excerpt is. I'm certified (well, was, it expired, but still) in network intrusion analysis.
This "shine a light and reveal those trails in the cyber-fog" business is SO SO dumb.
Also, what is this second passage even?
[tweet] [link]
Anyways, the spreadsheet that Byrne posted looks like this (first two pictures)
The data that Lindell eventually up on his big stupid website looks like this (last two pictures)
It's the same damn data, just formatted or split differently.
[tweet] [link]
Ok, so Byrne ended up with the bunk "PCAPs" (ps these aren't PCAPs) that eventually ended up in Lindell's hands. What happened in between?
Well, Byrne received the data sometime in Jan 2020 and thought it would be enough get the "federals" to live stream a recount of 6 states
[tweet] [link]
Only problem was that he couldn't get it to Trump. Enter Lindell.
Byrne sends Conan and someone else to deliver the PCAPs to Lindell, they convinced Lindell the PCAPS were legit, and then Lindell met with Trump days later.
(2nd pic is from https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/08/overlooked-development-in-mike-lindells-cyber-symposium/)
[tweet] [link]
Here's Lindell's side of how things went down (about ~:22 in).
Referring to supposed evidence of Chinese interference, he says "Jan 9th is when I got that piece of evidence, you know where I got it...I got one piece from him [Brannon] and others from other sources"
[tweet] [link]
He then segues into his wild explanation of how he ended up being photographed outside of the White House with a document calling for martial law - check this thread for more:
Tweet of get_innocuous/1463782901560995844
[tweet] [link]
So, Conan and a mystery person act as PCAP mules and meet up with Lindell on 1/9/20.
They show the "evidence" to Lindell, who buys it and sets up a meeting on 1/15 to show Trump.
It's unclear if Lindell ever got that meeting with Trump - he says he was shooed out of the WH
[tweet] [link]
Back to Byrne's article.
I swear to god if anyone ever describes reviewing data like this again, I will face palm my hand right through the back of my head. Grossest possible way to explain something as mundane as "he looked at the data" imo.
[tweet] [link]
And, well, obviously the data was complete bullshit and "Weaponized Autism"/Conan was wrong. Folks on Lindell's team even knew this ahead of time and tried to warn him.
Tweet of get_innocuous/1427859061672857602
[tweet] [link]
If these paragraphs don't permanently damage the credibility of Byrne, Conan, and Lindell, nothing will.
[tweet] [link]
Last tweet was a trick tweet: nothing will damage their credibility because most people that have bought into their evidence of voter fraud have been conditioned to be ok with goal posts that can't seem to stay in one spot.
[tweet] [link]
So that's it. Most of the information in the thread has been around for a while in one form or another, but I was stoked to be able to piece together a rough timeline that explains the provenance of the PCAPs.
[tweet] [link]
If you want further reading, I highly recommend the Dominion V Byrne case, specifically the initial complaint (1) and their opposition to Byrne's Motion to Dismiss (2), which contains these gems.
1: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.234316/gov.uscourts.dcd.234316.1.0.pdf
2: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.234316/gov.uscourts.dcd.234316.28.0.pdf
- Montgomery gave Byrne the fake PCAPs in Jan 2020
- Byrne couldn't meet w/Trump, so he gave the fake PCAPs to Conan
- 1/9 - Conan delivered them to Lindell
- 1/15 - Lindell tried to present them to Trump
- Lindell hyped them up for 8 months & that backfired spectacularly
